Having Difficult Conversations That Actually Work: A Values Approach
You've read the books on feedback. You've practiced the frameworks. You've prepared your talking points. And somehow, the conversation still went badly: defensive reactions, damaged relationships, and nothing actually resolved.
Here's what the frameworks miss: The Values-Based Difficult Conversation Method. It recognizes that difficult conversations threaten values, and addressing the threat to values directly is more effective than perfecting the delivery.
Why Frameworks Fail
Research on feedback increasingly questions the effectiveness of traditional feedback models. The "sandwich" method feels manipulative. Direct feedback triggers defensiveness. Constructive criticism often isn't experienced as constructive.
The assumption behind feedback frameworks is that delivery is the problem. Find the right words, the right structure, and the right moment, and difficult messages can land without difficulty.
But difficult conversations are difficult because they threaten something the other person values. No framework changes that. The threat exists regardless of delivery.
What Makes Conversations Difficult
The Valuegraphics Database tracks 56 values that drive human behavior across a million surveys globally. When we examine why difficult conversations trigger defensiveness, certain values are consistently threatened.
Personal Responsibility (ranked 36th at 18%) is threatened by criticism. People who take ownership of their work experience criticism as an attack on something they feel responsible for.
Respect (ranked 8th at 48%) can feel violated. Criticism can communicate: "You're not good enough." Even when that's not the intent, it can be the experience.
Belonging (ranked 4th at 56%) is at stake. Critical feedback can trigger fear: "Am I still part of this? Do I still belong here?"
Security (ranked 20th at 28%) becomes uncertain. "What does this mean for my job? My future? My standing?"
Competence (embedded in personal growth values) feels questioned. "Do they think I can't do this?"
Difficult conversations are difficult because they touch these values. Addressing the conversation without addressing the values threat creates defensiveness.
The Values-Based Difficult Conversation Method
Four steps that actually work:
Step 1: Acknowledge the values at stake before the content
Before delivering the difficult message, name what you know might feel threatened.
"I need to talk with you about something, and I want to be clear upfront: this doesn't change my respect for you or your place on this team."
"This conversation might feel like criticism of work you care about. I want you to know that's not what this is."
"I know feedback can feel threatening. That's not my intent here."
Naming the potential values threat doesn't eliminate it, but it creates awareness that you understand what's happening emotionally. This reduces defensiveness.
Step 2: Separate behavior from identity
Difficult feedback often feels like an identity attack. "You failed" becomes "You're a failure."
Separate explicitly:
- "This specific situation didn't work" (not "You don't work")
- "This approach needs to change" (not "You need to change")
- "This outcome wasn't what we needed" (not "You can't deliver what we need")
Language matters. "You" plus negative equals identity attack. "This situation" plus negative equals a problem-solving opportunity.
Step 3: Address Security directly
If there are Security implications, state them. If there aren't, state that too.
"This doesn't affect your job or your standing. I'm having this conversation because I believe in your ability to address it."
"I need to be honest; if this pattern continues, it becomes a bigger issue. But right now, this is a course correction, not a crisis."
People can't process feedback when they're anxious about their job. Address Security so they can actually hear the content.
Step 4: Invite collaboration rather than compliance
The goal isn't getting them to agree with your assessment. It's solving the underlying problem together.
"I've shared what I've observed. I'd like to hear your perspective on what's happening and how we can address it together."
"You might see this differently than I do. What's your take?"
"I don't have all the answers here. I need your thinking on how we move forward."
Collaboration protects autonomy and respects competence. Compliance demands threaten both.
During the Conversation
Watch for values triggers and address them in real time.
If they become defensive: "I can see this is landing as criticism. Let me be clear about what I'm trying to say and what I'm not trying to say."
If they seem anxious: "I want to make sure you're hearing this in context. This is about improvement, not about your position here."
If they shut down: "I may not be saying this well. What I want is for us to solve this together. What would help you engage with that?"
The conversation isn't a delivery mechanism. It's a real-time navigation of values and emotions.
After the Conversation
Difficult conversations don't end when the meeting ends. The person will process, reconsider, and potentially spiral.
Follow up:
- "I wanted to check in after our conversation. How are you thinking about what we discussed?"
- "I know that wasn't an easy conversation. I'm available if you want to talk more about it."
- Demonstrate continued belonging through normal interaction. Don't make them feel like they're on probation.
The follow-up reinforces that the values threats named in the conversation were genuine; their belonging, respect, and security are intact.
The Real Skill
The real skill in difficult conversations isn't delivery. It's empathy, genuinely understanding what values are at stake for the other person and addressing them directly.
This requires knowing them as a person. What do they value? What are they proud of? What would threaten their sense of self?
A difficult conversation with someone you truly understand goes differently from a difficult conversation with a role-filler.
The Strategic Question
Before your next difficult conversation, ask this: What does this person value that my message might threaten?
Then address that threat explicitly, before and during the conversation.
The frameworks are tools. Understanding values is the work.
Get the values right, and the framework barely matters.
Miss the values, and no framework saves you.
Remember: if you know what people value, you can change what happens next.
Download free tools, data, and reports at www.davidallisoninc.com/resources
Want to know What Matters Most to the people you need to inspire?
Download free guides and resources.
Use the free Valueprint Finder to see how your values compare.
Find out why people call David “The Values Guy.”
Search the blog library for ways to put values to work for you.
